![Mirant v Arup [2007] - Observations](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae6589_4da6c1d855fa4310bc1124c3fb113302~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/ae6589_4da6c1d855fa4310bc1124c3fb113302~mv2.webp)
![Mirant v Arup [2007] - Observations](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae6589_4da6c1d855fa4310bc1124c3fb113302~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/ae6589_4da6c1d855fa4310bc1124c3fb113302~mv2.webp)
Mirant v Arup [2007] - Observations
This post sets out some observations regarding the assessment of delay and critical path analysis contained in the UK case of Mirant...


The Effect of Programme Mitigation on a Prolongation Claim
In the case of Cleveland Bridge v Severfield [2012] the English Courts considered the impact of mitigation upon a prolongation claim. ...


Programme Evidence for Prolongation Claims
A number of interesting programming issues were discussed in the English case of Costain v Haswell [2009]. In particular the Court gave...


Scheduling and the 'Progress Override v Retained Logic' Conundrum
With the now common use of project management software to analyse construction progress and delays, comes the often overlooked question -...